[FIXED] How is a NFT Token ID assigned to an object (e.g., picture, tweet, video, etc.)

Issue

Background: Suppose I want to verify the ownership of some tweet or some picture by looking up the data in the blockchain. If my understanding is correct, I need to be able to assign a unique tokenId that represents that tweet/picture.

Question 1: Is there some standardization on how this ID is assigned? Do different platform perform this mapping in a unique way? I feel like without such a standardization, the non-fungibility becomes questionable (e.g., do you really own this tweet, or do you only own it if you apply the tweet->token ID mapping you crafted yourself?).

Question 2: Could you provide a few examples of how exactly is the token ID assigned to some (well-known) NFTs?

Solution

Is there some standardization on how this ID is assigned?

The ERC-721 standard explicitly states that there is no standard to assign the ID (except for the uint256 datatype):

While some ERC-721 smart contracts may find it convenient to start with ID 0 and simply increment by one for each new NFT, callers SHALL NOT assume that ID numbers have any specific pattern to them, and MUST treat the ID as a “black box”.

---

e.g., do you really own this tweet, or do you only own it if you apply the tweet->token ID mapping

Token ownership does not mean that you own the underlying resource. It only means that you own the token (representing the resource).

---

Could you provide a few examples of how exactly is the token ID assigned to some (well-known) NFTs?

• CryptoKitties - link, line 412, incrementing

  uint256 newKittenId = kitties.push(_kitty) - 1;
  

• CryptoPunks - link, lines 73 and 83, assigning ID set by the (authorized) caller

  mapping (uint => address) public punkIndexToAddress;
  
  function setInitialOwner(address to, uint punkIndex) {
      // ...
      punkIndexToAddress[punkIndex] = to;
  

Answered By - Petr Hejda

Answer Checked By - Mary Flores (PHPFixing Volunteer)